bleh wrote:space cadet
avatar champeen
TenuredVulture wrote:Jimmy is 2-12, which is bad. However, if he say gets 3 hits in the next 3 at bats, that makes him 5-15, which is pretty good. So, stop with the small n-size $#@!. Not only is it statistically meaningless, it's real easy to move those numbers as well.
TenuredVulture wrote:Jimmy is 2-12, which is bad. However, if he say gets 3 hits in the next 3 at bats, that makes him 5-15, which is pretty good. So, stop with the small n-size $#@!. Not only is it statistically meaningless, it's real easy to move those numbers as well.
JFLNYC wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Jimmy is 2-12, which is bad. However, if he say gets 3 hits in the next 3 at bats, that makes him 5-15, which is pretty good. So, stop with the small n-size $#@!. Not only is it statistically meaningless, it's real easy to move those numbers as well.
What do you figure the chances are Jimmy goes 3 for his next 3?
bleh wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Jimmy is 2-12, which is bad. However, if he say gets 3 hits in the next 3 at bats, that makes him 5-15, which is pretty good. So, stop with the small n-size $#@!. Not only is it statistically meaningless, it's real easy to move those numbers as well.
If he gets 300 straight hits, maybe he can raise his career OBP over .350
cartersDad26 wrote:LA is just laughing maniacally about the strikezone
JFLNYC wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Jimmy is 2-12, which is bad. However, if he say gets 3 hits in the next 3 at bats, that makes him 5-15, which is pretty good. So, stop with the small n-size $#@!. Not only is it statistically meaningless, it's real easy to move those numbers as well.
What do you figure the chances are Jimmy goes 3 for his next 3?
JFLNYC wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Jimmy is 2-12, which is bad. However, if he say gets 3 hits in the next 3 at bats, that makes him 5-15, which is pretty good. So, stop with the small n-size $#@!. Not only is it statistically meaningless, it's real easy to move those numbers as well.
What do you figure the chances are Jimmy goes 3 for his next 3?
uncle milt wrote:cartersDad26 wrote:LA is just laughing maniacally about the strikezone
pitch to utley looked good. keep in mind he's basically on the plate.