Bill McNeal wrote:What season are you on? I just finished the second.

rewatching the whole thing. into season 3.

jerseyhoya wrote:You're quite a catch. It'd be nuts for them to pick a lax guy over the summer intern.

Thanks jerseyhoya

Roommate while playing a demo of NCAA 2013, "look they have a ticker with live games. Just like espn. So cool."

Let those girls know that someday those lacrosse guys will be working for you. Which is a lie, of course, since they'll be working for their friend's Dad's insurance company, since he was a lacrosse guy too.

why is it when i dont go for a run i eat absolutely nothing all day, but when i do run i can eat up to 5000 calories

bury me wrote:why is it when i dont go for a run i eat absolutely nothing all day, but when i do run i can eat up to 5000 calories

cuz you're a homo

Trying that out on the internet before I apply it to real life. Wish me luck.

bury me wrote:why is it when i dont go for a run i eat absolutely nothing all day, but when i do run i can eat up to 5000 calories

Hmm. Could have something to do with the fact that you expend much more energy when you run that needs to replaced by means of food (i.e. calories). But I ain't no Mr. Wizard or nothing.

I think bury me's point is that burning 500 or even 1000 calories via running or whatever causes a disproportionate increase in appetite. I definitely find this to be true.

when i run i don't get hungry. usually fill up on water

Another good reason not to run. Besides making you tired, it makes you hungry. Who needs that?

i find i get hungrier when i don't run. go figure.

phatj wrote:I think bury me's point is that burning 500 or even 1000 calories via running or whatever causes a disproportionate increase in appetite. I definitely find this to be true.

right, which is why im debating running at all, because the amount of food is cancelling out most of the good effects. it shouldnt be hard to change when i eat, if i force myself.

Not sure if serious, but it all depends on what you take in.

Just heard a woman on the news being described as "one of the best conductors in the world". Didn't realize there was a huge gap between "best conductor" and "worst conductor", and who are these worst conductors?

BigEd76 wrote:Just heard a woman on the news being described as "one of the best conductors in the world". Didn't realize there was a huge gap between "best conductor" and "worst conductor", and who are these worst conductors?

I dunno, but I bet he works for SEPTA.

bury me wrote:

phatj wrote:I think bury me's point is that burning 500 or even 1000 calories via running or whatever causes a disproportionate increase in appetite. I definitely find this to be true.

right, which is why im debating running at all, because the amount of food is cancelling out most of the good effects. it shouldnt be hard to change when i eat, if i force myself.

Well, don't forget that the running will up your metabolism throughout the day so you're burning more calories even when you're not running. And you continue to burn fat up to an hour after you run. So even if you burn 500 calories while running, the after burn is going to be more. But look into HIIT which, from everything I've read, allows you to continue burning fat up to 24 hours after you workout if you're doing it the way you're supposed to. I've found it to be very effective for me. And like Pratt said, what you're eating makes a big difference. But I guess all that is for the fitness thread.

BigEd76 wrote:Just heard a woman on the news being described as "one of the best conductors in the world". Didn't realize there was a huge gap between "best conductor" and "worst conductor", and who are these worst conductors?

Orchestra or train?

Slowhand wrote:

bury me wrote:
Well, don't forget that the running will up your metabolism throughout the day so you're burning more calories even when you're not running. And you continue to burn fat up to an hour after you run. So even if you burn 500 calories while running, the after burn is going to be more. But look into HIIT which, from everything I've read, allows you to continue burning fat up to 24 hours after you workout if you're doing it the way you're supposed to. I've found it to be very effective for me. And like Pratt said, what you're eating makes a big difference. But I guess all that is for the fitness thread.

didnt realize that one of those threads existed, my mistake. anyways, some interesting things in here ill have to look into. danke'

phatj wrote:I think bury me's point is that burning 500 or even 1000 calories via running or whatever causes a disproportionate increase in appetite. I definitely find this to be true.

Hmm. I don't eat very much when I know I'm running later, just because I don't want something sitting heavily in my stomach, and don't have much of an appetite for a least a couple hours after a run, so I virtually always end up eating a lot less on days I run, as long as iIdon't pig out late at night. Everyone's different, I guess.