The Savior wrote:hicks' ascension over the last 8 weeks has been the difference for unc

This is true

Hahaha sure enough, UNCheat buddy of mine praising the defense. Because providence missed every shot

Would like Providence to get this to 15...

PTOITWCFTPP wrote:

The Savior wrote:hicks' ascension over the last 8 weeks has been the difference for unc

This is true

Hahaha sure enough, UNCheat buddy of mine praising the defense. Because providence missed every shot

the defense has been good. providence has been playing iso/hero ball for the last half hour between dunn/benji.

providence played much better when dunn was on the bench and other guys got involved. providence never got anything cohesive as a unit going offensively.

I don't think Indiana matches up very well. But they have a lot of athletes. Hopefully they make shots errrrrr this elite defense has an off night

PTOITWCFTPP wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

PTOITWCFTPP wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:Hey remember how our system and offense can't win in March?

Yeah they just dropped 54 points in the second half with only one three-pointer.

Cause you guys are going to shoot 80% when you need to!

Good win tho

It was almost all layups and dunks. Not like they were stroking 20-footers.

They hit jumpers too. Iowa State will win if Niang is his usual excellent self

He'll have to deal with Brogdon if he starts to have a good game.

Idk what's worse, the ACC hard ons or the west coast faction that goes on in this thread. Lol

702 wrote:Idk what's worse, the ACC hard ons or the west coast faction that goes on in this thread. Lol

the pac 12 is worse

The Savior wrote:

702 wrote:Idk what's worse, the ACC hard ons or the west coast faction that goes on in this thread. Lol

the pac 12 is worse

Oregon :stillalive:

they're my new favorite team

Nova time

ACC could end up with 6 Sweet 16 teams, but only one win against the top half of the bracket. Miami beat 14 and 11 seeds; Duke beat 13 and 12 seeds; Virginia and Carolina beat 16 and 9 seeds; Notte Dame beat an 11 seed and gets a 14 seed; and Syracuse beat a 7 and gets a 15 seed.

It's like doing well in the regular season benefits you in the postseason.

702 wrote:Idk what's worse, the ACC hard ons or the west coast faction that goes on in this thread. Lol

Sure I guess. Acc is 10-1 so far. 17-5 last year. It's pretty well founded

ReadingPhilly wrote:It's like doing well in the regular season benefits you in the postseason.

Or that they are some how responsible for lower seeded teams upsetting other power conference teams.

dfisher9 wrote:ACC could end up with 6 Sweet 16 teams, but only one win against the top half of the bracket. Miami beat 14 and 11 seeds; Duke beat 13 and 12 seeds; Virginia and Carolina beat 16 and 9 seeds; Notte Dame beat an 11 seed and gets a 14 seed; and Syracuse beat a 7 and gets a 15 seed.

This makes me laugh.

Nova doesn't look very good and is pretty dominating. Good sign for them.

CalvinBall wrote:

702 wrote:Idk what's worse, the ACC hard ons or the west coast faction that goes on in this thread. Lol

Sure I guess. Acc is 10-1 so far. 17-5 last year. It's pretty well founded

I was making fun of the posters in here including myself

Not comparing the actual conferences. Sheesh

pacino wrote:Nova doesn't look very good and is pretty dominating. Good sign for them.

Insert Oregon and I believe this will be said tonight.

702 wrote:

pacino wrote:Nova doesn't look very good and is pretty dominating. Good sign for them.

Insert Oregon and I believe this will be said tonight.

Hater

pacino wrote:Nova doesn't look very good and is pretty dominating. Good sign for them.

They don't look good? What game are you watching?