Ace Rothstein wrote:This is the perfect example why the NHL is a joke

heyeaglefn wrote:

Ace Rothstein wrote:This is the perfect example why the NHL is a joke

What sport isn't a joke?

Orpheous wrote:Ok, don't allow the goal. Calling that penalty is insane.

Ace Rothstein wrote:Interference on a player that doesn't go in the crease

69.4
Contact Outside the Goal Crease
-
If an attacking player
initiates
any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the
goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal
will be disallowed.
A goalkeeper is not “fair game” just because he is outside the goal
crease. The ap
propriate penalty should be assessed in every case
where an attacking player makes unnecessary contact with the
goalkeeper. However, incidental contact will be permitted when the
goalkeeper is in the act of playing the puck outside his goal crease
provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid
such unnecessary contact.
When a goalkeeper has played the puck outside of his crease and
is then prevented from returning to his crease area due to the
deliberate actions of an attacking player, such player may be
penalized for goalkeeper interference. Similarly, the goalkeeper may
be penalized, if by his actions outside of his crease he deliberately
interferes with an attacking player who is attempting to play the puck
or an opponent.
Refer als
o
to Reference Tables –
Table 16
– Interference on the
Goalkeeper Situations (page 1
47
)

swishnicholson wrote:

Orpheous wrote:Ok, don't allow the goal. Calling that penalty is insane.

Dumb question, but is that possible under the rules.

Seems like the fairest application.

swishnicholson wrote:

Orpheous wrote:Ok, don't allow the goal. Calling that penalty is insane.

Dumb question, but is that possible under the rules.

Seems like the fairest application.

Orpheous wrote:Ok, don't allow the goal. Calling that penalty is insane.

69.2
Penalty
- In all cases in which an attacking player initiates intentional
or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, whether or not the goalkeeper
is inside or outside the goal crease, and whether or not a goal is
scored, the attacking player will receive a penalty (minor or major, as
the Referee deems appropriate). In all cases where the infraction
being imposed is to the attacking player for hindering the goalkeeper’s
ability to move freely in his goal crease, the penalty to be assessed is
for goalkeeper interference.
In exercising his judgment, the Referee should give more
significant consideration to the degree and nature of the contact with
the goalkeeper than to the exact location of the goalkeeper at the time
of the contact.

Ace Rothstein wrote:

heyeaglefn wrote:

Ace Rothstein wrote:This is the perfect example why the NHL is a joke

What sport isn't a joke?

The nhl officiating makes the NFL look great

PTOITWCFTPP wrote:He jumped ffs. So no goal and it's a penalty