CalvinBall wrote:Dershowitz arguing that getting the president elected is in the public's interest and therefore that cannot be an illegal quid pro quo when he does things to get elected. Remarkable.

I don't claim to be a genius lawyer but these arguments are so mindfully stupid and obviously wrong I am wondering in what reality he is existing.

it's more of the same. just playing to the base. not trying to convince reasonable people, just trying to keep people from jumping ship.

Graham and Cruz bringing up Romney and his sons was so fucking stupid.

CSPAN taking calls from Q conspirators lol. Biden's, Pelosi's, and Obama's kids are all getting kickbacks into slush funds from Ukraine.

Now a caller is rambling about a barista.

Squire wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:Dershowitz arguing that getting the president elected is in the public's interest and therefore that cannot be an illegal quid pro quo when he does things to get elected. Remarkable.

I don't claim to be a genius lawyer but these arguments are so mindfully stupid and obviously wrong I am wondering in what reality he is existing.

That would say that only second term presidents could face impeachment as the interference would be discarded on the basis of a potential second term run.

momadance wrote:CSPAN taking calls from Q conspirators lol. Biden's, Pelosi's, and Obama's kids are all getting kickbacks into slush funds from Ukraine.

My trip onto CSPAN told me that they do no pre-screening nor do they cut anyone off over made up, provably false shit

Sekulow making a case against witnesses by making a case for witnesses.

WHISTLEBLOWER BAH GAWD

@Phil_Mattingly
Sen. Rand Paul has been informed he won’t be allowed to ask his trial question related to the origins of the investigation, per source.
Unclear exactly why at this point

momadance wrote:WHISTLEBLOWER BAH GAWD

@Phil_Mattingly
Sen. Rand Paul has been informed he won’t be allowed to ask his trial question related to the origins of the investigation, per source.
Unclear exactly why at this point

Whistler blowers have protections. Who, other then Rand Paul and the crony crew does not know this? Now show of hand, who actually does not know this?

thephan wrote:

momadance wrote:WHISTLEBLOWER BAH GAWD

@Phil_Mattingly
Sen. Rand Paul has been informed he won’t be allowed to ask his trial question related to the origins of the investigation, per source.
Unclear exactly why at this point

Whistler blowers have protections. Who, other then Rand Paul and the crony crew does not know this? Now show of hand, who actually does not know this?

IDK, thephan. We are all part of the NWO now. The rules have changed. Up is down and left is right.

EDIT: I mean what kind of world are we living in where you have people making an argument to have LESS information than is available to make probably the most consequential decision of their lives.

My line of thinking is that it was probably some hack question. Had to be bad if it did not pass the smell test after the Graham/Cruz clunker

Philbin just gave an answer saying he didn't know the case but spent 5 minutes guessing what the case said. Great lawyering.

Feel like Ds could ask some basic questions to the WH Counsel and watch them flounder because they'd have to dodge, but they keep asking the House Managers.

Think a simple- Why did the aid get released 3 days after the house investigation launched? What corruption was found in those three days and did we find Hunter Biden did nothing wrong?

Hunter Biden went fishing in Norway!

GOP senators believe they have the votes to block witnesses

Heroes

I praise fealty to our King, they said in unison.

They've had one 20 min break. Not sure how they whipped it out.

I don't see this reported anywhere.