Woody wrote:Also also last night I saw this tweet, which...would...really be something:

@20committee 11h11 hours ago

#NSA friends tell me they have Hannity in OPERATIONAL calls with known RIS agents. Team Mueller has it all. He is going down. SAD!

JUburton wrote:

Woody wrote:Also also last night I saw this tweet, which...would...really be something:

@20committee 11h11 hours ago

#NSA friends tell me they have Hannity in OPERATIONAL calls with known RIS agents. Team Mueller has it all. He is going down. SAD!

this seems like some louise mensch shit

JUburton wrote:

Woody wrote:Also also last night I saw this tweet, which...would...really be something:

@20committee 11h11 hours ago

#NSA friends tell me they have Hannity in OPERATIONAL calls with known RIS agents. Team Mueller has it all. He is going down. SAD!

this seems like some louise mensch shit

But thousands of pages of long-secret, assassination-related documents released by the National Archives last week show that, within a few years of Kennedy’s murder, some in the CIA began to worry internally that the official story was wrong—an alarm the agency never sounded publicly.

Specifically, key CIA officials were concerned by the mid-1970s that the agency, the FBI, the Secret Service and the White House commission led by Chief Justice Earl Warren had never followed up on important clues about Oswald’s contact with foreign agents, including diplomats and spies for the Communist governments of Cuba and the Soviet Union, who might have been aware of his plans to kill Kennedy and even encouraged the plot. (There is no credible evidence cited in the documents released so far that Cuban leader Fidel Castro or other foreign leaders had any personal role in ordering Kennedy’s murder.)

But what if the “best truth” was wrong? According to documents made public last week, the CIA was alarmed by the mid-1970s to realize that no one had properly followed up on clues about an especially mysterious chapter in Oswald’s life—a six-day, apparently self-financed trip to Mexico City beginning in late September 1963, two months before the assassination. The reason for the trip has never been determined with certainty, although he told his wife, Marina, that he went there to obtain a visa that would allow him to defect to Cuba, much as he had once attempted to defect to the Soviet Union.

The CIA acknowledged long ago that the agency’s Mexico City station had Oswald under surveillance during the trip, and that he met there with Cuban and Soviet diplomats and spies. The CIA station chief said later he was convinced that Oswald had a brief sexual relationship with a Mexican woman who worked in the Cuban consulate. Although there is no credible evidence of Soviet involvement in the assassination, Oswald’s other contacts in Mexico included—shockingly enough—a KGB assassinations expert who doubled as an accredited Soviet diplomat. A top-secret June 1964 FBI report, made public in the 1990s but apparently never seen by key investigators for the Warren Commission, suggests that Oswald was overheard threatening to kill Kennedy during his visits to the Cuban diplomatic compound in Mexico.

CalvinBall wrote:

Woody wrote:Also yesterday we found out Carter Page has been under surveillance since 2014, which probably isn't good news if he was any sort of Russian errand boy for any length of time

Also also last night I saw this tweet, which...would...really be something:

@20committee 11h11 hours ago

#NSA friends tell me they have Hannity in OPERATIONAL calls with known RIS agents. Team Mueller has it all. He is going down. SAD!

Also also also Clint Watts and another dude launched this site that monitors 600 Russian propaganda Twitter accounts: http://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org/

pacino wrote:Julian Assange is retweeting guys that believe in Pizzagate and other fake Clinton scandals

pacino wrote:

pacino wrote:Julian Assange is retweeting guys that believe in Pizzagate and other fake Clinton scandals

now he just called the Trump administration the most transparent in history

wikileaks also accused WaPo of burning sources. omg


it's just a trolling outfit

It seems safe to assume, yes. A month ago, you would have been right. Macron had an approval rating of 62% on taking office in May, and in June it went up to 64%.

And now? As of this week, he’s down to 54%.

C’est la vie, I guess. Look what happened to Theresa May. Yes, but this sort of precipitous decline has not been seen in France since Jacques Chirac shed 15 points in the mid-90s. Macron is even more unpopular than his predecessor, François Hollande, who managed an approval rating of 56% at the same stage of his presidency.

What has gone wrong? There were four high-profile resignations in June, following preliminary investigations into two separate scandals.

Terr-eeh-buh-luh. But it is spending cuts tied to Macron’s economic reforms that have really upset people. He has announced an overhaul of French pension and labour laws, and a €850m (£760m) reduction in the military budget, which prompted a top general to quit.

Why is he going back on his promises? These were his promises. Macron was remarkably upfront during the campaign about the need for reform.

Woody wrote:Sessions now ramping up press attacks regarding leaks

I believe this is Chapter 3 of Love Me Donald: The Idiot's Guide to Building a Fascist Dictatorship (And Other Reasons My Father Never Hugged Me)

Woody wrote:Ron Howard: "Sessions was the leaker"

pacino wrote:

Woody wrote:Ron Howard: "Sessions was the leaker"

Jivanka definitely leak stuff to the press