World Series 2009 Game 2 Thread

by **kruker** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:33:54

i love pedro

by **ReadingPhilly** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:33:59

99 pitches was a bit much and they don't have to worry about hitting for the pitcher. i almost would've done pedro for 5 and happ for a while, then whoever.

i'd go madson here for the k.

by **cartersDad26** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:33:59

get nasty

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:34:12

kruker wrote:i love pedro

by **drsmooth** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:34:18

Trent Steele wrote:the thing that kills me is the utter pointlessness of it. what was the possible gain in leaving a tired Pedro in when no one in the bullpen has pitched in a week and there is an off day tomorrow? As I said earlier, I wouldnt have let Pedro pitch the 6th let alone this inninng. Stupid/

bah. suck back some fine vino & enjoy la dolce vita

by **Trent Steele** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:34:24

mcare89 wrote:
Trent Steele wrote:the thing that kills me is the utter pointlessness of it. what was the possible gain in leaving a tired Pedro in when no one in the bullpen has pitched in a week and there is an off day tomorrow? As I said earlier, I wouldnt have let Pedro pitch the 6th let alone this inninng. Stupid/

Because the bullpen isn't that good?

I mean, if this is 2008, yes, but the bullpen has been a problem all year? Why the hell are we suddenly OK with them going 4 innings?

I have way more faith in Park and Madson than Pedro at 100 pitches.

by **mcare89** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:34:35

Alrighty, Chopper it is.

Let's do this shit.

by **VFB** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:34:41

save us, chan ho

by **cartersDad26** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:35:00

Time check in Seoul?

by **ReadingPhilly** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:35:06

great job by fox letting us know who was warming up

by **Benny Lava** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:35:12

burnett took all the first strikes for himself.

by **Trent Steele** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:35:13

drsmooth wrote:
Trent Steele wrote:the thing that kills me is the utter pointlessness of it. what was the possible gain in leaving a tired Pedro in when no one in the bullpen has pitched in a week and there is an off day tomorrow? As I said earlier, I wouldnt have let Pedro pitch the 6th let alone this inninng. Stupid/

bah. suck back some fine vino & enjoy la dolce vita

I'm back home. I havent slept in 40 something hours. I'm getting cranky

by **CalvinBall** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:35:20

rivera never screws up. he is one of those blue avatar things that have super alien powers. no chance.

by **jerseyhoya** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:35:30

I'm glad Trent is posting so much so I don't have to

by **drsmooth** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:35:31

Woody wrote:
Trent Steele wrote:the thing that kills me is the utter pointlessness of it. what was the possible gain in leaving a tired Pedro in when no one in the bullpen has pitched in a week and there is an off day tomorrow? As I said earlier, I wouldnt have let Pedro pitch the 6th let alone this inninng. Stupid/

Popup, GIDP

popup, strikeout, groundout

get it right

by **Benny Lava** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:35:41

good god how did posoda look at that

by **cartersDad26** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:35:55

CalvinBall wrote:rivera never screws up. he is one of those blue avatar things that have super alien powers. no chance.

but i'm the negative one

by **jerseyhoya** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:36:04

Shit

Nice piece of hitting, or whatnot

by **SpeedRacer** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:36:04

Pedro did pitch well. We can be upset we're losing, and that some cheap hits got through, but holding the Yanks to two runs (both solo homers) is no joke.

To re-iterate an earlier point, he didn't pitch poorly, he just went up against a pitcher have a career high night. Which I'm ok with, honestly. This team thrives when they're against the wall.

We. got. this.

by **laf837** » Thu Oct 29, 2009 22:36:11

eff this

Archived

World Series 2009 Game 2 Thread